Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 9/8/1986

Zimmerman v. Bell

Citations

  • 800 F.2d 386
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “federal courts do not sit simply to bestow vindication in a vacuum”
  • affirming district court's dismissal of claims under Rule 12(b)(1), but no indication that judgment for plaintiff compelled
  • refusing to certify the class “[b]eeause the extent of knowledge of the omitted facts or reliance on misrepresented facts will vary from shareholder to shareholder”
  • affirming denial of class certification and dismissal of claim based on defendant's tendered offer fully satisfying plaintiff's damages
  • noting in a securities fraud case that plaintiffs “personal stake in the outcome had disappeared” and her claim had become moot after she had received an offer of judgment in full satisfaction of her claim
  • “The danger of imposing ‘incompatible standards of conduct’ on the party opposing the class is . . . not normally posed by a request for money damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Zimmerman v. Bell

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.