· 5/17/1996
William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., Appellee
Citations
- 84 F.3d 1525
- 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1182
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- litigants are deemed to have exercised due diligence if they “present[] a justifiable excuse for not submitting the evidence prior to the summary judgment ruling”
- “Although the rule usually applies to errors by the court or clerk, it may also be used to correct mistakes by the parties.”’
- to show “due diligence,” the movant must offer a “justifiable excuse” for not discovering the material in a timely manner
- \A class representative must be part of the class and possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Magill, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.