· 9/28/1983
Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco Incorporated
Citations
- 719 F.2d 23
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 885
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the “accepted view” is “that the decision of issues not actually litigated, e.g., a default judgment, has no preclusive effect in other litigation”
- discussing plaintiffs’ concern that accepting individual offers of judgment after denial of class certification might waive issue of class certification for appeal
- “In substance, what defendant did by its offer was no different ... than if it had submitted to a default judgment on the individual claims.”
- “all that remains is their individual claims, for which Interco admittedly has offered to pay much more than plaintiffs could obtain by suit.”
- no justification for expending court resources after defendant offered plaintiff more than plaintiff could recover on merits
- “Once the defendant offers to satisfy the plaintiffs entire demand, there is no dispute over which to litigate ... and a plaintiff who refuses to acknowledge this loses outright, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friendly, Kearse, Cardamone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.