Skip to main content
· 9/28/1983

Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco Incorporated

Citations

  • 719 F.2d 23
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 885
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the “accepted view” is “that the decision of issues not actually litigated, e.g., a default judgment, has no preclusive effect in other litigation”
  • discussing plaintiffs’ concern that accepting individual offers of judgment after denial of class certification might waive issue of class certification for appeal
  • “In substance, what defendant did by its offer was no different ... than if it had submitted to a default judgment on the individual claims.”
  • “all that remains is their individual claims, for which Interco admittedly has offered to pay much more than plaintiffs could obtain by suit.”
  • no justification for expending court resources after defendant offered plaintiff more than plaintiff could recover on merits
  • “Once the defendant offers to satisfy the plaintiffs entire demand, there is no dispute over which to litigate ... and a plaintiff who refuses to acknowledge this loses outright, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friendly, Kearse, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.