· 5/14/1991
Yost v. Early
Citations
- 589 A.2d 1291
- 87 Md. App. 364
- 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the business judgment rule [is] a presumption that corporate directors acted in accordance with” the standard of care imposed upon them
- reaffirming that an alleged oral lifetime employment contract was only employment at-will because there was no showing that it clearly expressed the specific terms of the agreement, including duties, wages, and performance guidelines
- conversion claim preempted where alleged interference with a property right is reproduction of a copyrighted work
- when the length of the employment contract is not specified, the employee is deemed to be an employee at-will
- “If the corporation ratifies the contract or accepts its benefits with full knowledge of the circumstances of their acquisition, however, the corporation is bound by the contract’s obligations.”
- the trier of fact may disbelieve a witness even when uncontradicted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.