Skip to main content
· 5/14/1991

Yost v. Early

Citations

  • 589 A.2d 1291
  • 87 Md. App. 364
  • 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the business judgment rule [is] a presumption that corporate directors acted in accordance with” the standard of care imposed upon them
  • reaffirming that an alleged oral lifetime employment contract was only employment at-will because there was no showing that it clearly expressed the specific terms of the agreement, including duties, wages, and performance guidelines
  • conversion claim preempted where alleged interference with a property right is reproduction of a copyrighted work
  • when the length of the employment contract is not specified, the employee is deemed to be an employee at-will
  • “If the corporation ratifies the contract or accepts its benefits with full knowledge of the circumstances of their acquisition, however, the corporation is bound by the contract’s obligations.”
  • the trier of fact may disbelieve a witness even when uncontradicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.