District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/29/2009
Zarycki-Weig v. Weig
Citations
- 25 So. 3d 573
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10365
- 2009 WL 2243807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The spouse claiming that the other spouse is voluntarily unemployed bears the burden of proof.”
- “The two primary considerations in determining permanent periodic alimony are need and ability to pay.”
- “A trial court shall impute income to an unemployed parent where such unemployment is voluntary, ‘absent a finding of fact by the court of physical or mental incapacity or other circumstances over which the parent has no control.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross, Warner, Ciklin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- TIMOTHY RICHARD FOX v. PAMELA SUE FOXDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-19· cited 13×
- Vitro v. VitroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-06· cited 13×
- Sallaberry v. SallaberryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-17· cited 9×
- Marshall-Beasley v. BeasleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-07· cited 6×
- Mudafort v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-08· cited 4×
- Schafstall v. SchafstallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-22· cited 4×
- ANEMEY K. HUERTAS DEL PINO v. CARLOS E. HUERTAS DEL PINODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-01· cited 4×
- Green v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-06· cited 3×
- Robert B. Manfre v. Catherine N. ManfreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-10· cited 2×
- Shafer v. ShaferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-08· cited 1×
- Middleton v. MiddletonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-06· cited 1×
- ROBIN FIALA v. JOEL FIALADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-01-12
- ONTHONIO WHYTE v. VALENTINA ECKERT WHYTEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-03-02
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schram v. SchramDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-07· cited 38×
- Chipman v. ChipmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-05· cited 21×
- Roy v. RoyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-02· cited 11×
- Francavilla v. FrancavillaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 9×
- Greene v. GreeneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-11· cited 7×
- Fleck v. FleckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-08· cited 7×
- Esteva v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 5×
- Lamont v. LamontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.