Fleck v. Fleck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the trial court erred by failing to consider whether an award of nominal permanent alimony was warranted where the parties had disparate earning capacities and the wife had a need for alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zarycki-Weig v. Weig
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-29· cited 14×
• Schmidt v. Schmidt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-10· cited 14×
• Biskie v. Biskie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-21· cited 10×
• Berry v. Berry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-24· cited 4×
• Perkovich v. Humphrey-Perkovich
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-26· cited 3×
• Olsen v. Olsen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-14· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blanchard v. Blanchard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 25×
• Walker v. Walker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-21· cited 16×
• Roy v. Roy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-02· cited 11×
• Yitzhari v. Yitzhari
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 9×
• Esteva v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 5×
• Cunningham v. Cunningham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-03· cited 3×