Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Esteva v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 913 So. 2d 684
  • 2005 WL 2373426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he rule, generally, is that where there is a likelihood of a change in the future that would warrant an award of alimony, the court should retain jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Wells, and Cortiã‘as

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.