Schram v. Schram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to impute income, trial court must make factual findings as to probable and potential earning level, source of imputed and actual income, and adjustments to income
• “A court may impute income where a party is willfully earning less and the party has the capability to earn more by the use of his best efforts”
• ‘When imputing income to a party, the trial court must set forth factual findings as to the probable and potential earnings level, source of imputed and actual income, and adjustments to income.”
• court’s reliance on fact that husband earned psychology degree thirty years earlier did not support imputation where there was no evidence that he ever worked in that field or was qualified to obtain a position in that field

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).