Zapp v. Zhenli Ye Gon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that this factor weighed in favor of keeping documents unsealed despite court’s agreement with movant that there was no “particularized need for public access”
• explaining that factor six favors disclosure of exhibits submitted to the court with the intent that the court will rely on them in adjudicating a dispute
• finding that where the plaintiff filed exhibits in conjunction with his summary judgment “intend[ing] for the [c]ourt to rely on these filings in adjudicating his dispute,” this factor weighed in favor of disclosure
• finding an unsupported and cursory argument that public disclosure of certain documents would damage an individual’s reputation “d[id] not weight in favor of sealing” those documents
• “[Because] Zapp does not claim that the Documents’ continued disclosure cause[s] him legal prejudice, the Court finds that this factor does not weigh in favor of sealing the Documents.”
• outlining standard governing motions to seal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).