District of Columbia· 7/23/2019
Gilliard v. Gruenberg
Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
- United States v. HubbardD.C. Circuit· 1980-07-24· cited 350×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1996-11-01· cited 169×
- Harold D. Johnson, M.D. v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1991-12-13· cited 108×
- MetLife, Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight CouncilD.C. Circuit· 2017-08-01· cited 95×
- United States v. Fred Anderson, the Tribune CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1986-09-04· cited 75×
- In Re Newsday, Inc.Second Circuit· 1990-01-29· cited 67×
- ['GUTTENBERG v. EMERY']District of Columbia· 2014-03-19· cited 42×
- In Re Application of New York Times Co.District of Columbia· 2008-11-17· cited 37×
- United States Ex Rel. Durham v. Prospect Waterproofing, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-10-04· cited 31×
- Zapp v. Zhenli Ye GonDistrict of Columbia· 2010-10-28· cited 30×
- Friedman v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2009-12-07· cited 29×
- Berliner Corcoran & Rowe LLP v. OrianDistrict of Columbia· 2009-10-13· cited 28×
- Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-26· cited 26×
- Upshaw v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2010-12-09· cited 16×
- Burrell v. ShepardD.C. Circuit· 2018-07-27· cited 16×
- United States of America Ex Rel Sanjay Grover v. Related Companies, L.P.District of Columbia· 2013-11-14· cited 15×
- Chien v. SullivanD.C. Circuit· 2018-04-25· cited 14×
- United States v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia· 2011-12-23· cited 10×
- Jones v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.