United States of America Ex Rel Sanjay Grover v. Related Companies, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “{hjarm to reputation and career” is not a compelling reason for non-disclosure
• noting that “the fact that the Relator, himself, is abandoning the litigation does not lessen or change the public’s interest in hearing [the] allegations”
• denying motion to seal or redact and concluding that “the fact that the Relator … is abandoning the litigation does not lessen or change the public’s interest in hearing allegations that the Government was defrauded”
• rejecting request to redact identities of the parties from the complaint
• “The more relevant a pleading is to the central claims of the litigation, the stronger the presumption of unsealing the pleading becomes.”
• “The more relevant a pleading is to the central claims of the litigation, the stronger the presumption of unsealing the pleading becomes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).