Skip to main content
· 11/29/2023

Press Application for Access to Judicial Records in Case No. 23-Sc-31, in the Matter of the Search of Information That is Stored at Premises Controlled by Twitter, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that 7 although the word in question was “descriptive” and therefore “cannot be registered” “as a 8 trademark for the described product,” “[t]his fact is of no assistance to” the petitioner’s 9 argument that the “registration was obtained fraudulently”
  • “[A] descriptive word in a foreign language 10 cannot be registered in the United States as a trademark for the described product.”
  • “[A] descriptive word in a foreign language cannot be registered in the United States 5 as a trademark for the described product.”
  • “Any ‘duty’ owed by an 12 applicant for trademark registration must arise out of the statutory requirements of the 13 Lanham Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.