Alaska Supreme Court· 8/11/1978
Young v. Williams
Citations
- 583 P.2d 201
- 1978 Alas. LEXIS 686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the ten-year limitations statute restricts an action to obtain a judgment for past-due child support arising from an unregistered California decree
- holding that attempt to obtain judgment for past-due support arising from California decree which was not registered in Alaska pursuant to URESA constitutes new action restricted by AS 09.10.040
- factual argument not raised below will not be considered on appeal
- factual argument not raised below will not be considered on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Witz, Boochever, Rabi-Nowitz, Connor, Burke, Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-04-05· cited 86×
- Williams v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1982-09-03· cited 62×
- Williams v. BudkeMontana Supreme Court· 1980-02-08· cited 42×
- Cedergreen v. CedergreenAlaska Supreme Court· 1991-05-24· cited 41×
- Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court· 1994-11-25· cited 37×
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 35×
- Cochran v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama· 2008-09-26· cited 32×
- Epperson v. EppersonAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 26×
- Burke v. MakaAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-03-15· cited 20×
- Malekos v. Chloe Ann YinAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-12-21· cited 18×
- Vockner v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court· 1986-01-10· cited 17×
- Wood v. Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court· 1984-10-30· cited 16×
- Ruppe v. RuppeAlaska Supreme Court· 2015-09-25· cited 15×
- Pavlik v. State, Department of Community & Regional AffairsAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 14×
- Pacana v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. PacanaAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 13×
- Foster v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-03-11· cited 13×
- Lantz v. LantzAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-01-29· cited 11×
- City of Lakewood v. DeRoosColorado Court of Appeals· 1981-02-13· cited 11×
- In re A.B.Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-04-27· cited 10×
- Whittle v. WeberAlaska Supreme Court· 2010-12-03· cited 9×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-07-09· cited 175×
- Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-10-21· cited 118×
- Kephart v. KephartD.C. Circuit· 1952-03-03· cited 59×
- Bradford v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-06-13· cited 39×
- Slade v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-04-27· cited 38×
- Finnern v. BrunerNebraska Supreme Court· 1958-11-07· cited 37×
- Cullinan v. CullinanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-02-19· cited 30×
- Dickerson v. GeiermannAlaska Supreme Court· 1962-01-26· cited 29×
- Maule v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals· 1973-10-18· cited 29×
- Baures v. BauresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-12-22· cited 26×
- Grossman v. GrossmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-04-25· cited 20×
- Riney v. RineySupreme Court of Kansas· 1970-07-17· cited 19×
- Hauck v. SchuckSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-06-13· cited 19×
- Chudzinski v. ChudzinskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-09· cited 15×
- Frazier v. RaineySupreme Court of Georgia· 1971-03-04· cited 14×
- Euwer v. City of PalmerAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-12-23· cited 4×
- Parhm v. ParhmCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-12-04· cited 3×
- Robles v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.