Epperson v. Epperson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party’s “bare claim” that the custodial parent had low living expenses did not create a genuine issue of material fact
• affirming the trial court’s award of increased child support beginning on the date the modification motion was served on the obligor parent
• holding hearing not required if no relevant fact disputes
• affirming a trial court’s decision to determine a party’s child support obligation without an evidentiary hearing because the party’s “bare claim” that the custodial parent had low living expenses did not create a genuine issue of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).