Skip to main content

Perry v. State

Citations

  • 158 S.W.3d 438
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2147
  • 2004 WL 2896595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \[t]he mitigation special issue does not send 'mixed signals' because it permits a capital sentencing jury to give effect to mitigating evidence in every conceivable manner in which the evidence might be relevant\
  • considering whether there were disputed facts relevant to voluntariness of oral statement
  • considering whether there were disputed facts relevant to voluntariness of oral statement
  • evidence of appellant’s intoxication and injury did not render confession involuntary because it did not involve police coercion or other official overreaching
  • defendant not entitled to any jury instruction under art. 38.23(a); evidence of his intoxication and injury \does not raise any constitutional voluntariness issues because this evidence does not involve any police coercion or other official over-reaching.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.