Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 632 So. 2d 245
  • 1994 WL 51827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the fact that the amendment [to an information] was erroneously accomplished by an unsworn interlineation, rather than a sworn-to amended information, was waived . . . because the defendant never objected below to this defect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkdull and Hubbart and Cope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.