District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/22/1994
Young v. State
Citations
- 632 So. 2d 245
- 1994 WL 51827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “the fact that the amendment [to an information] was erroneously accomplished by an unsworn interlineation, rather than a sworn-to amended information, was waived . . . because the defendant never objected below to this defect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barkdull and Hubbart and Cope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 21×
- State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-05-26· cited 12×
- State v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30· cited 11×
- Robins v. ColomboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-08· cited 8×
- Rosser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-26· cited 6×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-15· cited 5×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-25· cited 1×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-10
- Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-26· cited 72×
- Lackos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-11-04· cited 52×
- Champlin v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida· 1960-11-23· cited 10×
- Fallada v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.