Skip to main content

State v. Garcia

Citations

  • 692 So. 2d 984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding state was entitled to amend information on day of trial to correct date of alleged offense from June 24 to July 24, where no prejudice flowed from late correction of scrivener’s error
  • finding no prejudice where the State sought to amend the information to reflect the correct date of the charge
  • “The State may also substantively amend an information during trial, even over the defendant’s objection, unless there is a showing of prejudice to the substantive rights of the defendant.”
  • “The State may also substantively amend an information during trial, even over the defendant’s objection, unless there is a showing of prejudice to the substantive rights of the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Nesbitt and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.