State v. Clements

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that the state may substantively amend an information midtrial unless it prejudices the defendant’s substantial rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clements v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-10· cited 4×
• Goldman v. Campbell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-01· cited 4×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-24· cited 4×
• Hauss v. Waxman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-02· cited 3×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-26
• Ngoc C. Thach v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2022-06-30
• C.L.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-20
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JAMAL SANDERS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-11-15
• REUBEN JAMES THOMPSON vs STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-04-21
• Rebecca Louise Raber v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-31

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-26· cited 72×
• Lackos v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-11-04· cited 52×
• State v. Stell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 22×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 21×
• Rivera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-04· cited 20×
• State v. Belton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-09· cited 13×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-22· cited 11×
• Clements v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-25· cited 2×