West Virginia Supreme Court· 7/12/1985

Yoho v. Triangle PWC, Inc.

Citations

336 S.E.2d 204
175 W. Va. 556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the West Virginia non-retaliation statute did not apply because the discharge \was mandated by a facially neutral provision of a collective bargaining agreement\
affirming dismissal of § 23-5A-1 claim where the employee was discharged pursuant to a “facially neutral provision of the collective bargaining agreement”
“The power to declare an action against public policy is a broad power and one difficult to define. . . . [D]espite the broad power vested in the courts to determine public policy, we must exercise restraint when we use it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotherton, McGRAW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.