Lansalot A. Olguin v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Arizona law, in dicta, to require plaintiffs alleging retaliatory discharge to cite specific Arizona statutes or policies
• rejecting employee’s contention that a personnel policy manual constituted a separate contract of employment and concluding that “any independent agreement ... [can] be effective only as part of the collective bargaining agreement”
• claim to enforce side agreement that could only have been effective if it were part of the collective bargaining agreement was deemed a claim to enforce the collective bargaining agreement
• a plaintiff cannot evade federal jurisdiction by “omitting from the complaint federal law essential to his claim, or by casting in state law terms a claim that can be made only under federal law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).