Twigg v. Hercules Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that drug testing is not violative of public policy where job responsibility involves public safety or the safety of others
• holding contrary to public policy for employer to require employee drug testing unless based upon reasonable suspicion of employee’s drug usage or when employee’s job responsibility involves public safety or safety to others
• allowing urinalysis based on individualized suspicion or when employee’s job implicates safety concerns
• allowing urinalysis based on individualized suspicion or when employee's job implicates safety concerns
• where we held it was contrary to public policy emanating from the common law right of privacy for an employer to require an employee to submit to drug testing
• where we held it was contrary to public policy emanating from the common law right of privacy for an employer to require an employee to submit to drug testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).