Yates v. Fisher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in per curiam opinion that court of appeals erroneously used interrogatory responses in favor of the answering party by relying on them to defeat summary judgment
• decided under former version of Rule 197.3
• same as to interrogatory responses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).