Crooks v. Moses

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “For the negligent activity theory of liability to be applicable, the evidence must show that the injuries were directly related to the activity itself’
• “the facts of this case cannot support a negligent activity cause of action because of the lack of contemporaneous activity”
• if alleged wrong-doer not liable as a matter of law, then determination of vicarious liability issue never reached
• [I]f the alleged tortfeasor is not liable as a matter of law, then determination of agency and vicarious liability issues are never reached.”
• plaintiffs injury resulting from, explosion of unattended bonfire could not support negligent activity theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).