Pennwell Corp. v. Ken Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding what is a matter of substance and what is a matter of procedure is determined by the law of the forum state
• holding that “[b]y the express terms of this provision [now § 54.002], the TSRA has no application to the sales representative relationship between Ken and PennWell because . . . . Ken was not authorized t o , and did not, solicit orders within the state of Texas”
• examining materials filed by both sides before concluding appellant met Rule 203 burden to inform trial court adequately about Japanese law
• reciting testimony that rates charged were in accordance with rates previously charged and were usual, customary, and reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).