Wysinski v. Mazzotta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]here can be no latent ambiguity where, as here, there was land owned by the grantor which satisfied the description contained in the deed of conveyance”
• explaining that “[t]here can be no latent ambiguity where, as here, there was land owned by the grantor which satisfied the description contained in the deed of conveyance”
• using earlier deeds in chain of title to determine exact nature and quantity of real estate interest conveyed
• “With respect to unambiguous deeds, a court must ascertain what is the meaning of the words used, not what may have been intended by the parties as shown by parol.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).