Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/10/1984
Wysinski v. Mazzotta
Citations
- 472 A.2d 680
- 325 Pa. Super. 128
- 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3926
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[t]here can be no latent ambiguity where, as here, there was land owned by the grantor which satisfied the description contained in the deed of conveyance”
- explaining that “[t]here can be no latent ambiguity where, as here, there was land owned by the grantor which satisfied the description contained in the deed of conveyance”
- using earlier deeds in chain of title to determine exact nature and quantity of real estate interest conveyed
- “With respect to unambiguous deeds, a court must ascertain what is the meaning of the words used, not what may have been intended by the parties as shown by parol.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Wieand, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wright, P. v. Misty Mountain Farm, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-09· cited 29×
- Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-23· cited 23×
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. LysobeySupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-05-10· cited 22×
- Kadel v. McMonigleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-03-26· cited 15×
- Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. WaltmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-11· cited 13×
- Grasso v. ThimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-04-17· cited 12×
- Yoho v. StackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-07· cited 10×
- Cronan v. Castle Gas Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-09· cited 9×
- In re Estate of MissonisBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-11-24
- Miller, R. v. Bunting, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-04-08
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-09-11· cited 95×
- TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-11-13· cited 72×
- Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-04-18· cited 47×
- Central Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 42×
- Hatcher v. ChesnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-06-24· cited 21×
- Brady v. YodanzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-04· cited 19×
- Baptist Church in Great Valley v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-03-13· cited 19×
- Held v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-12-07· cited 17×
- Kimmel v. SvonavecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-01-07· cited 15×
- Will v. PIPERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-07-26· cited 14×
- Covert AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-28· cited 14×
- Murrer v. American Oil CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-28· cited 13×
- Sabados v. KiralySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-20· cited 12×
- Denver Chicago Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-01-09· cited 10×
- Harvey v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1879-05-07· cited 9×
- In Re Estate of KostelnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 8×
- Johns v. CastellucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-04· cited 8×
- South Connellsville Borough IncorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-07-13· cited 6×
- PACI v. SHIPLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-03-14· cited 5×
- RIDGWAY NATIONAL BANK Et Al. v. PENNSYLVANIASupreme Court· 1961-01-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.