· 4/17/1989
Grasso v. Thimons
Citations
- 559 A.2d 925
- 384 Pa. Super. 593
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1049
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “... equity will not enforce a restrictive covenant in the absence of any benefit to the party seeking enforcement of the covenant.”
- equitable estoppel issue first raised in answer to motion for summary judgment preserved for appeal
- “none of the Lots shall be used for any purpose other than residential uses” created a use restriction, prohibiting the operation of an accounting business
- restrictive covenants, although strictly construed, legally are enforceable if unambiguous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Sole, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.