Skip to main content
· 4/17/1989

Grasso v. Thimons

Citations

  • 559 A.2d 925
  • 384 Pa. Super. 593
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “... equity will not enforce a restrictive covenant in the absence of any benefit to the party seeking enforcement of the covenant.”
  • equitable estoppel issue first raised in answer to motion for summary judgment preserved for appeal
  • “none of the Lots shall be used for any purpose other than residential uses” created a use restriction, prohibiting the operation of an accounting business
  • restrictive covenants, although strictly construed, legally are enforceable if unambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Sole, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.