Skip to main content
· 3/26/1993

Kadel v. McMonigle

Citations

  • 624 A.2d 1059
  • 425 Pa. Super. 253
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Statute of Frauds bars the enforcement of all oral agreements modifying a deed or land transfer
  • holding that the Divorce Code is intended to provide the exclusive means of property determinations between divorcing spouses and a party may not attempt post decree to litigate property issues which could have been raised in the divorce proceedings
  • finding that real estate broker could not be liable for civil conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of his property when the alleged co-conspirator was not primarily liable because she was free to sell and convey the property at issue
  • decree cannot be attacked collaterally except on the basis of extrinsic fraud
  • decree cannot be attacked collaterally except on the basis of extrinsic fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Olszewski, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.