· 3/26/1993
Kadel v. McMonigle
Citations
- 624 A.2d 1059
- 425 Pa. Super. 253
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Statute of Frauds bars the enforcement of all oral agreements modifying a deed or land transfer
- holding that the Divorce Code is intended to provide the exclusive means of property determinations between divorcing spouses and a party may not attempt post decree to litigate property issues which could have been raised in the divorce proceedings
- finding that real estate broker could not be liable for civil conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of his property when the alleged co-conspirator was not primarily liable because she was free to sell and convey the property at issue
- decree cannot be attacked collaterally except on the basis of extrinsic fraud
- decree cannot be attacked collaterally except on the basis of extrinsic fraud
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Olszewski, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.