District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/19/2012
Wright v. State
Citations
- 113 So. 3d 43
- 2012 WL 4094821
- 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15743
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Wright failed to provide any details regarding the allegedly foregone plea offer, which is required as part of the prejudice analysis in claims such as these.”
- “[Appellant] failed to provide any details regarding the allegedly foregone plea offer, which is required as part of the prejudice analysis in claims such as these.”
- “[Appellant] failed to provide any details regarding the allegedly foregone plea offer, which is required as part of the prejudice analysis in claims such as these.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crenshaw, Kelly, Northcutt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 3,280×
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court· 2012-03-21· cited 2,193×
- Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-01· cited 504×
- Cottle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-08· cited 111×
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 49×
- MCI Exp., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-30· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.