WRB Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a trade practice of using masonite doors on paint-grade cabinets does not overcome an unambiguous contract provision requiring wood doors on paint-grade cabinets
• “The objection must be directed to the contracting officer (or his authorized representative) because, by the agreement of the parties embodied in that provision, he is only person with the prerogative to alter the contractual requirements.”
• the total cost “theory has never been favored by the court and has been tolerated only when no other mode was available and when the reliability of the supporting evidence was fully substantiated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named WRB Corp. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• WRB Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1966-12-16· cited 5×