Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The assertion of duress must ... have been the result of the defendant’s conduct and not by the plaintiff’s necessities.”
• sets out elements common to situations where duress has been found to exist
• “[T]he requirements to establish duress are exacting. Three elements must be found: ‘(1) that one side involuntarily accepted the terms of another; (2) that circumstances permitted no other alternative; and (3
• “[T]he requirements to establish duress are exacting. Three elements must be found: ‘(1) that one side involuntarily accepted the terms of another; (2) that circumstances permitted no other alternative; and (3
• “[T]he requirements to establish duress are exacting. Three elements must be found: ‘(1) that one side involuntarily accepted the terms of another; (2) that circumstances permitted no other alternative; and (3
• “[T]he requirements to establish duress are exacting. Three elements must be found: ‘(1) that one side involuntarily accepted the terms of another; (2) that circumstances permitted no other alternative; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).