D. New Jersey· 3/15/1996
W.P. v. Poritz
Citations
- 931 F. Supp. 1187
- 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 327
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9335
- 1996 WL 374015
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that sentencing for the commitment of a crime and determination of a Tier Classification involves separate risk assessments
- “The tailored notification for each Tier II and Tier III offender is designed to serve that remedial goal.... The means employed ... are directly proportional to the ends which Megan’s Law is designed to serve.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bissell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Third Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 301×
- Tesmer v. GranholmSixth Circuit· 2003-06-17· cited 27×
- Benevento v. Life USA Holding, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-01-13· cited 8×
- ALAN A. v. VernieroD. New Jersey· 1997-06-27· cited 6×
- Stewart v. Associates Consumer Discount Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-10-27· cited 6×
- Chiang v. VenemanVirgin Islands· 2003-02-28· cited 2×
- Gagnon v. NH Dept, of H&HSD. New Hampshire· 1999-08-31
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 7,192×
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,061×
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,521×
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 1,834×
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 702×
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-25· cited 688×
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationThird Circuit· 1974-04-09· cited 637×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
- Baby Neal v. CaseyThird Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonThird Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Third Circuit· 1990-05-09· cited 384×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-04-12· cited 365×
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1964-03-26· cited 282×
- Focus v. Allegheny County Court Of Common PleasThird Circuit· 1996-02-01· cited 256×
- Lewis v. CurtisThird Circuit· 1982-03-03· cited 194×
- Weiss v. York HospitalThird Circuit· 1984-09-27· cited 140×
- Morton v. BeyerThird Circuit· 1987-06-24· cited 127×
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyThird Circuit· 1985-02-04· cited 116×
- Klitzman, Klitzman and Gallagher v. Robert J. Krut, Vernon Holmes, W. Hunt Dumont, Michael MilnerThird Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.