Skip to main content
· 6/12/1995

Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.

Citations

  • 515 U.S. 277
  • 115 S. Ct. 2137
  • 132 L. Ed. 2d 214
  • 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court decisions on whether to exercise jurisdiction in declaratory judgment actions are subject only to abuse-of-discretion appellate review
  • holding that Brillhart governs the propriety of a district court’s decision to stay a declaratory judgment action
  • holding that a discretionary standard governs a district court's decision to stay a federal declaratory judgment action during the pendency of parallel state court proceedings
  • holding that review of district court declaratory judgment decisions is for abuse of discretion, not de novo
  • holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in staying declaratory judgment action pending outcome of parallel state proceeding
  • holding that the standard for determining whether to exercise such discretion to abstain is highly discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.