· 6/12/1995
Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.
Citations
- 515 U.S. 277
- 115 S. Ct. 2137
- 132 L. Ed. 2d 214
- 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court decisions on whether to exercise jurisdiction in declaratory judgment actions are subject only to abuse-of-discretion appellate review
- holding that Brillhart governs the propriety of a district court’s decision to stay a declaratory judgment action
- holding that a discretionary standard governs a district court's decision to stay a federal declaratory judgment action during the pendency of parallel state court proceedings
- holding that review of district court declaratory judgment decisions is for abuse of discretion, not de novo
- holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in staying declaratory judgment action pending outcome of parallel state proceeding
- holding that the standard for determining whether to exercise such discretion to abstain is highly discretionary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor, Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.