Orona v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that error in prosecutor’s accusation that defendant’s attorneys “know how to argue to get people off” was harmless in that statement was not so prejudicial, under facts of the case, as to call for reversal
• concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that error in prosecutor’s accusation that defendant’s attorneys “know how to argue to get people off” was harmless in that statement was not so prejudicial, under facts of the case, as to call for reversal
• passing as opposed to emphasized or repeated improper comment tends toward a finding of harmlessness
• passing as opposed to emphasized or repeated improper comment tends toward a finding of harmlessness
• concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that error in prosecutor = s accusation that defendant = s attorneys A know how to argue to get people off @ was harmless in that statement was not so prejudicial, under facts of the case, as to call for reversal
• statement by prosecution that defense counsel was adept at getting criminal defendants “off the hook” did not contribute to conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).