Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/10/2016
Commonwealth v. Brown
Citations
- 139 A.3d 208
- 2016 Pa. Super. 98
- 2016 WL 2732086
- 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Pennsylvania “precedent requires that an expert opinion be offered to prove the cause of death”
- holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause of death were admissible
- holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause of death were admissible
- holding medical examiner’s independent conclusions regarding the cause ofydeath were admissible
- reiterating, that an expert’s independent conclusions based upon inadmissible evidence are admissible
- after finding Confrontation Clause violation, this Court examines whether error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Olson, Platt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-01· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. AkrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-17· cited 55×
- Travaris Richard Christian v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 13×
- Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-01-26· cited 6×
- Tony Terrell Clark v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2022-05-12
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 1,225×
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 2012-06-18· cited 994×
- Davis v. AyalaSupreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 836×
- Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-29· cited 675×
- State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court· 2014-03-20· cited 335×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-01-09· cited 276×
- People v. DungoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-10-15· cited 216×
- United States v. MooreD.C. Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 183×
- United States v. James and MallaySecond Circuit· 2013-03-28· cited 147×
- People v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 121×
- Commonwealth v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 118×
- Commonwealth v. RosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-02-26· cited 108×
- Wood v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-11-02· cited 101×
- Cuesta-Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-10-12· cited 101×
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-27· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.