Skip to main content

Wolff v. State

Citations

  • 981 So. 2d 651
  • 2008 WL 2116919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing trial court’s award of restitution is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion
  • recognizing trial court's award of restitution is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion
  • finding the trial court erred in basing restitution on replacement value rather than fair market value
  • remanding due to “absen[ce] of any evidence of the fair market value of the stolen equipment”
  • reversing restitution award as to the amount for the replacement cost of stolen car equipment and accessories, and directing that on remand “the trial court use the fair market value in re-calculating the award for those items”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.