Skip to main content
· 4/14/1993

Domaceti v. State

Citations

  • 616 So. 2d 1148
  • 1993 WL 113350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding restitution awards generally should be limited to the price of replacement and not the original cost of the item
  • stating that restitution amount should be established with evidence of FMV at time of theft, absent circumstances showing FMV would not adequately compensate victim or otherwise serve purpose of restitution
  • stating that restitution amount should be established with evidence of FMV at time of theft, absent circumstances showing FMV would not adequately compensate victim or otherwise serve purpose of restitution
  • “Certainly where there is a ready market of identical items to the stolen item, restitution should be limited to its replacement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.