· 4/14/1993
Domaceti v. State
Citations
- 616 So. 2d 1148
- 1993 WL 113350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding restitution awards generally should be limited to the price of replacement and not the original cost of the item
- stating that restitution amount should be established with evidence of FMV at time of theft, absent circumstances showing FMV would not adequately compensate victim or otherwise serve purpose of restitution
- stating that restitution amount should be established with evidence of FMV at time of theft, absent circumstances showing FMV would not adequately compensate victim or otherwise serve purpose of restitution
- “Certainly where there is a ready market of identical items to the stolen item, restitution should be limited to its replacement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.