Skip to main content

Bennett v. State

Citations

  • 944 So. 2d 524
  • 2006 WL 3733885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Guesstimates and speculative testimony are inappropriate evidence on which to base an award of restitution.\
  • “A victim’s testimony, without documentation, is not enough to support an award of restitution.” (citing State v. Schuette, 782 So. 2d 935, 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001))
  • “A victim’s testimony, without documentation, is not enough to support an award of restitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.