Witty v. Dukakis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that our case law “has 4 firmly embraced the commonsensical notion that striking 5 similarities between affidavits are an indication that the 6 statements are ‘canned.’”
• “It follows that if an action against the answering defendants is 4 decided in their favor, then the action should be dismissed against both answering and 5 defaulting defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).