Skip to main content
· 7/24/1990

Esmat Zaklama, M.D. v. Mount Sinai Medical Center

Citations

  • 906 F.2d 645
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 287
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12225
  • 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,105
  • 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 871
  • 1990 WL 91627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that District Court generally is without jurisdiction to rule in -78- case on appeal until mandate has issued
  • “Practi[tiJoners must adhere to applicable local rules in order for those local rules to have effect and federal courts by enforcement will preserve the integrity of local rules.”
  • “Practioners [sic] must adhere to applicable local rules in order for those local rules to have effect and federal courts by enforcement will preserve the integrity of local rules, absent problems of a constitutional dimension.”
  • district courts have considerable latitude in applying their own rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Johnson, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.