Air Line Pilots Association v. Precision Valley Aviation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[w]ithin wide limits, it is for courts, not litigants, to decide what rules are desirable and how rigorously to enforce them.”
• explaining that \[d]istrict courts enjoy broad latitude in administering local rules\ and \are entitled to demand adherence to specific mandates contained [therein]\
• explaining that “[vjalid local rules are an important vehicle by which courts operate” and “carry the force of law”
• noting that district courts “enjoy broad latitude in administering local rules”
• noting that district courts “enjoy broad latitude in administering local rules”
• holding a “noncompliant” Rule 59(e) 9 Although not precedential, we find the reasoning of the unpublished decisions cited in this opinion instructive. See 10th Cir. R. 32.1 (“Unpublished decisions are not precedential, but may be cited for their persuasive value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).