Skip to main content
· 2/4/1997

Anderson v. Boston School Committee

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 762
  • 1997 WL 33333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a principal’s accusing a teacher of breaking a lock did not support the teacher’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim
  • noting that, although the rationale for a denial of a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 “should be unambiguously communicated, the lack of explicit findings is not fatal where the record itself, evidence or colloquy, clearly indicates one or more sufficient supporting reasons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.