Skip to main content

Winston Perkins v. State

Citations

  • 394 S.W.3d 203
  • 2012 WL 3525538
  • 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 6798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the videos were “created and preserved to appeal to deviant and voyeuristic interests”
  • holding that recorded images of a teenage girl tending to “ordinary personal hygiene” were lewd because of “the invasion of personal privacy required to obtain the images and the exploitation of’ the minor and the admitted fact that Perkins viewed the resulting videos with a friend
  • “If the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer, it is lewd.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bland, Massengale, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Winston Perkins v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.