Veterans Claims· 1/5/1996

Winslow v. Brown

Citations

8 Vet. App. 469
1996 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 3
1996 WL 4293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

denying motion for oral argument where Court did not believe it would materially assist in disposition of appeal
denying motion for oral argument where Court does not believe it will materially assist the disposition of the appeal
denying motion for oral argument where Court does not believe it will materially assist the disposition of the appeal
denying motion for oral argument where Court did not believe it would materially assist in disposition of appeal
where the Court reaffirmed the validity of the intervening change of controlling law exception to the law of the case doctrine
“A lower tribunal, ‘upon receiving the mandate of an appellate court, may not alter, amend, or examine the mandate, or give any further relief or review, but must enter an order in strict compliance with the mandate’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farley, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.