Winslow v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because there is no general duty to intervene, mere presence at the commission of a tort, or the failure to object, is insufficient to constitute concerted action for purposes of establishing liability
• holding that because there is no general duty to intervene, mere presence at the commission of a tort, or the failure to object, is insufficient to constitute concerted action for purposes of establishing liability
• explaining that “a person is liable in a civil action for aiding and abetting if: (1) [t]he person undertakes conduct that as a matter of objective fact aids another in the commission of an unlawful act; and (2
• passenger not liable for negligent look-out unless he assumed that part of driver's responsibilities prior to accident
• passenger not liable for negligent look-out unless he assumed that part of driver’s responsibilities prior to accident
• “we conclude that a person may aid and abet a negligent tort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).