Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 3/18/1985

Piambino v. Bailey

Citations

  • 757 F.2d 1112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “law of the case doctrine applies to all issues decided expressly or by necessary implication; it does not extend to issues the appellate court did not address.”
  • “If the trial court fails fully to implement the mandate, the aggrieved party may apply to the appellate court for enforcement, by petitioning for a writ of mandamus.”
  • plaintiffs lacked requisite property interest to entitle them to appointment of receiver where they were “merely prosecuting a tort action for the recovery of unliquidated money damages and ha[d] not reduced their claims to judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Goldberg, Tjoflat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Piambino v. Bailey

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.