Skip to main content
· 8/30/2006

Mildred Nolan v. R. James Nicholson

Citations

  • 20 Vet. App. 340
  • 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 779
  • 2006 WL 2481991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a daughter lacked standing before the Court to pursue her mother’s death benefits claim because the applicable statute “clearly limits its scope to surviving spouses” and no claim had been made for accrued benefits
  • observing that the Court has never granted a limited remand for an accrued benefits eligibility determination
  • explaining VA's changes to its accrued benefits regulation to conform to the amended section 5121(a)
  • explaining VA's changes to its accrued benefits regulation to conform to the amended section 5121 (a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kasold, Moorman, Schoelen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.