Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 3/29/2019

Winder v. Berryhill

Citations

  • 369 F. Supp. 3d 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Court disagrees with the Plaintiff that requiring ‘handling’ implies ambidexterity, meaning that there is no apparent conflict between the VE testimony and the DOT.”
  • “An ALJ does not have to explicitly walk through these factors, so long as the Court can conclude that the ALJ applied the substance of the treating physician rule and provided good reasons for the weight [he or] she gives to the treating source’s opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.