S.D. New York· 6/3/2008
Ortiz v. Barkley
Citations
- 558 F. Supp. 2d 444
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43653
- 2008 WL 2266313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that reviewing court “is only obliged to review the Report for clear error” where “objections largely reiterate the arguments made to, and rejected by” the magistrate judge
- noting that reviewing court “is only obliged to review the Report for clear error” where “objections largely reiterate the arguments made to, and rejected by” the magistrate judge
- noting that reviewing court “is only obliged to review the Report for clear error” where “objections largely reiterate the arguments made to, and rejected by” the magistrate judge
- “Reviewing courts should review a report and recommendation for clear error where objections are ‘merely perfunctory responses,’ .. . ‘rehashing .. . the same arguments set forth in the original petition.””
- “Reviewing courts should review a report and recommendation for clear error where objections are merely perfunctory responses, .. . rehashing . . . the same arguments set forth in the original petition.”
- “Reviewing courts should review a report and recommendation for clear error where objections are merely perfunctory responses, .. . rehashing . . . the same arguments set forth in the original petition.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard J. Holwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dipilato v. 7-Eleven, Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-08-25· cited 217×
- George v. Professional Disposables International, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-11-16· cited 114×
- Wider v. ColvinE.D. New York· 2017-03-29· cited 46×
- State v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court· 2021-12-03· cited 20×
- Maldonado v. BurgeS.D. New York· 2010-03-23· cited 16×
- Winder v. BerryhillE.D. New York· 2019-03-29· cited 14×
- Seifts v. Consumer Health Solutions LLCS.D. New York· 2014-11-21· cited 12×
- Dimartino v. BerryhillE.D. New York· 2018-08-22· cited 9×
- Messer v. Bentley Manhattan, Inc. (In re Madison Bentley Associates, LLC)S.D. New York· 2014-09-15
- Nambiar v. the Central Orthopedic Group, LLPSecond Circuit· 2025-10-28
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 20,800×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,060×
- House v. BellSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 2,367×
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,205×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals· 1961-03-23· cited 1,115×
- Burgos v. HopkinsSecond Circuit· 1994-01-26· cited 696×
- Camardo v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension PlanW.D. New York· 1992-06-19· cited 368×
- Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1998-01-12· cited 359×
Other cases named Ortiz v. Barkley
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.