· 11/26/2008
Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.
Citations
- 655 F. Supp. 2d 169
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96682
- 2008 WL 5049961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[A] magistrate judge's decision is contrary to law only where it runs counter to controlling authority.\
- “[U]nlike prosecution of an initial patent application, the Patent Act expressly curtails the scope of reexamination, prohibiting any claim amendment that would enlarge the scope of the initial patent”
- “[T]he district court must affirm the decision of the magistrate judge unless the district court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mauskopf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.