Skip to main content

Windel v. Carnahan

Citations

  • 379 P.3d 971
  • 2016 Alas. LEXIS 114
  • 2016 WL 5335675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]ssues not properly raised or briefed at trial are not properly before this court on appeal” (alteration in original) (quoting Burts v. Burts, 266 P.3d 337, 344 (Alaska 2011))
  • holding argument was waived where it was “given only a cursory statement in the argument portion of [the] brief” (quoting Burts v. Burts, 266 P.3d 337, 344 (Alaska 2011))
  • stating that “where a point is given only a cursory statement in the argument portion of a brief, [it] will not be considered on appeal” (quoting Burts v. Burts, 266 P.3d 337, 344 (Alaska 2011))
  • noting that inadequately briefed arguments are waived
  • “We have held that ‘[i]ssues not properly raised or briefed at trial are not properly before this court on appeal.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting Burts v. Burts, 266 P.3d 337, 344 (Alaska 2011))
  • “[W]aiver due to inadequate briefing ‘is not correctable by arguing the issue in a reply brief.’ ” (quoting Adamson v. Univ. of Alaska, 819 P.2d 886, 889 n.3 (Alaska 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers, Winfree, Maassen, Bolger, Fabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.